Drug Interactions: Decision Trees

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Drug Development and Drug Interactions
Possible Models for Decision-Making


Possible Model for Decision Making: CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Figure 1. CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

NME: New molecular entity

* Additional population pharmacokinetic analysis may assist the overall evaluation.

+ negative results from an in vivo cocktail study would preclude further evaluation to determine whether an NME is an inhibitor or an inducer of a particular CYP enzyme


Possible Models for Decision-Making: P-gp-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Figure 2. Possible model for decision-making: whether an investigational drug is a substrate for P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor is needed.

Reference: Lei Zhang, John M. Strong, Wei Qiu, Lawrence J. Lesko, and Shiew-Mei Huang. Modified from Scientific Perspectives on Drug Transporters and Their Role in Drug Interactions  Mol Pharm. 2006; 3(1), 62-69, Epub Jan 4 2006. [PDF] [external link]

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is a substrate for P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor is needed

*For Caco-2 cells, net flux ratio is calculated as (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B); For MDR1-overexpressed cell lines, net flux ratio is calculated as ratio of (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B) MDR1 to (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B,) wild-type.
(a) An acceptable system produces next flux ratios of probe substrates similar to the literature values. A net flux ratio >2 for the investigational drug is a positive signal for further evaluation. Note: there is a concern that this value is too liberal and will lead to too may positive results. An alternative is to use a % value (net flux of investigation drug relative to a probe substrate, such as digoxin).
(b) reduction of the flux ratio significantly (> 50%) or to unity


Possible Model for Decision Making: P-gp Inhibitor and Digoxin Interaction Studies

Figure 3. Possible model for decision-making: whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor for p-gp and whether in vivo drug interaction studies with a P-gp probe substrate, such as digoxin, is needed

Reference: Lei Zhang, John M. Strong, Wei Qiu, Lawrence J. Lesko, and Shiew-Mei Huang. Modified from Scientific Perspectives on Drug Transporters and Their Role in Drug Interactions [PDF] [external link] Mol Pharm. 2006; 3(1), 62-69, Epub Jan 4 2006.

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor for p-gp and whether in vivo drug interaction studies with digoxin are needed

* For Caco-2 cells, net flux ratio is calculated as (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B); For MDR1-overexpressed cell lines, net flux ratio is calculated as ratio of (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B) MDR1 to (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B,) wild-type.

Note that [I] represents the mean steady state Cmax value for total drug (bound and unbound) following administration of the highest proposed clinical dose.

PDF requires the free Adobe Acrobat Reader


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Need A Digitek Digoxin Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was Your Health Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Need A Digitek Digoxin Lawyer?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was Your Health Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Digitek Digoxin Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Digitek Digoxin case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Unsafe Drugs: Digitek Digoxin Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.